Hawaii State Constitution at Injury Attorney Hawaii

Hawaii State Constitution

Injury Lawyer Hawaii

William Lawson - Personal Injury Attorney Hawaii
 


 

General Info

What is a Personal Injury Claim? (basic)

Do I Need an Accident Lawyer in Hawaii?

Finding a Personal Injury Accident Lawyer in Hawaii

Get Legal Help at
Injury Lawyer Hawaii


Maui, Kauai, Lanai & Big Island Injuries

Preparing a Claim or Case After an Injury

About Injury Lawyer Hawaii- Christian Attorney Wm Lawson

Insurance Coverage for Injuries - Hawaii



Types of Injury

Brain & Head Injuries - Hawaii

Spinal Cord Injuries- SCI - Hawaii

Catastrophic Injury Claims - Hawaii

Wrongful Death Claims - Hawaii

Broken Bone Injuries - Hawaii

Burn Accidents (Fire or Chemical) - Hawaii

Disc | Disk Injuries - Hawaii



Motor Vehicle Accidents

Car Accidents - Hawaii

Drunk Driver Accidents - Hawaii

Truck and Bus Accidents - Hawaii

Moped and Pedestrian Accidents - Hawaii

Auto Claims and Insurance - Hawaii

Motorcycle Claims & Insurance - Hawaii



Other Accidents

Defective Products Liability - Hawaii

Ocean, Boating & Maritime Accidents - Hawaii

Construction & Equipment Accidents - Hawaii

Drowning and Swimming Pool Accidents - Hawaii

Recreational Accidents - Hawaii

Electrical Accidents - Hawaii

Elevator Accidents - Hawaii

Explosion Accidents - Hawaii

Insurance Claims and Bad Faith - Hawaii

Medical & Professional Malpractice - Hawaii

Dog Bites, Animal Attacks - Hawaii

Fall Accidents- Trip, Slip, etc. - Hawaii



Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Million Dollar Advocates Forum

AVVO Top Rated Personal Injury Attorney
AVVO Top Rated Personal Injury Attorney

AVVO Clients' Choice Personal Injury Lawyer
AVVO Clients' Choice Personal Injury Lawyer

American Association for Justice fka American Trial Lawyers Association
American Association for Justice

ATLA Top 100
ATLA Top 100

Hawaii Association for Justice fka Consumer Lawyers Hawaii
Hawaii Association for Justice

Stanford Law School
Stanford Law School

American Bar Association
American Bar Association

Marquis' Who's Who
Marquis' Who's Who
in the World,
Who's Who
in America and
Who's Who
in American Law




 

Hawaii State Constitution

ARTICLE XVII - REVISION AND AMENDMENT


INDEX TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

pointer section titles


pointer preamble

pointer article I

pointer article II

pointer article III

pointer article IV

pointer article V

pointer article VI

pointer article VII

pointer article VIII

pointer article IX

pointer article X

pointer article XI

pointer article XII

pointer article XIII

pointer article XIV

pointer article XV

pointer article XVI

pointer article XVII

pointer article XVIII


pointer download text (zip, 41K)

pointer index (pdf, 45K)


pointer disclaimer
 


THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

As Amended and in Force January 1, 2000

ARTICLE XVII

REVISION AND AMENDMENT

METHODS OF PROPOSAL

Section 1. Revisions of or amendments to this constitution may be proposed by constitutional convention or by the legislature. [Ren Const Con 1978 and election Nov 7, 1978]

CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION

Section 2. The legislature may submit to the electorate at any general or special election the question, "Shall there be a convention to propose a revision of or amendments to the Constitution?" If any nine-year period shall elapse during which the question shall not have been submitted, the lieutenant governor shall certify the question, to be voted on at the first general election following the expiration of such period.

ELECTION OF DELEGATES

If a majority of the ballots cast upon such a question be in the affirmative, delegates to the convention shall be chosen at the next regular election unless the legislature shall provide for the election of delegates at a special election.

Notwithstanding any provision in this constitution to the contrary, other than Section 3 of Article XVI, any qualified voter of the district concerned shall be eligible to membership in the convention.

The legislature shall provide for the number of delegates to the convention, the areas from which they shall be elected and the manner in which the convention shall convene. The legislature shall also provide for the necessary facilities and equipment for the convention. The convention shall have the same powers and privileges, as nearly as practicable, as provided for the convention of 1978.

MEETING

The constitutional convention shall convene not less than five months prior to the next regularly scheduled general election.

ORGANIZATION; PROCEDURE

The convention shall determine its own organization and rules of procedure. It shall be the sole judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its members and, by a two-thirds vote, may suspend or remove any member for cause. The governor shall fill any vacancy by appointment of a qualified voter from the district concerned.

RATIFICATION; APPROPRIATIONS

The convention shall provide for the time and manner in which the proposed constitutional revision or amendments shall be submitted to a vote of the electorate; provided that each amendment shall be submitted in the form of a question embracing but one subject; and provided further, that each question shall have designated spaces to mark YES or NO on the amendment.

At least thirty days prior to the submission of any proposed revision or amendments, the convention shall make available for public inspection, a full text of the proposed amendments. Every public library, office of the clerk of each county, and the chief election officer shall be provided such texts and shall make them available for public inspection. The full text of any proposed revision or amendments shall also be made available for inspection at every polling place on the day of the election at which such revision or amendments are submitted.

The convention shall, as provided by law, be responsible for a program of voter education concerning each proposed revision or amendment to be submitted to the electorate.

The revision or amendments shall be effective only if approved at a general election by a majority of all the votes tallied upon the question, this majority constituting at least fifty per cent of the total vote cast at the election, or at a special election by a majority of all the votes tallied upon the question, this majority constituting at least thirty per cent of the total number of registered voters.

The provisions of this section shall be self-executing, but the legislature shall make the necessary appropriations and may enact legislation to facilitate their operation. [Am Const Con 1968 and election Nov 5, 1968; ren and am Const Con 1978 and election Nov 7, 1978; am SB 578 (1979) and SB 1703 (1980) and election Nov 4, 1980]

AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY LEGISLATURE

Section 3. The legislature may propose amendments to the constitution by adopting the same, in the manner required for legislation, by a two-thirds vote of each house on final reading at any session, after either or both houses shall have given the governor at least ten days' written notice of the final form of the proposed amendment, or, with or without such notice, by a majority vote of each house on final reading at each of two successive sessions.

Upon such adoption, the proposed amendments shall be entered upon the journals, with the ayes and noes, and published once in each of four successive weeks in at least one newspaper of general circulation in each senatorial district wherein such a newspaper is published, within the two months' period immediately preceding the next general election.

At such general election the proposed amendments shall be submitted to the electorate for approval or rejection upon a separate ballot.

The conditions of and requirements for ratification of such proposed amendments shall be the same as provided in section 2 of this article for ratification at a general election. [Ren and am Const Con 1978 and election Nov 7, 1978]

VETO

Section 4. No proposal for amendment of the constitution adopted in either manner provided by this article shall be subject to veto by the governor. [Ren Const Con 1978 and election Nov 7, 1978]

CONFLICTING REVISIONS OR AMENDMENTS

Section 5. If a revision or amendment proposed by a constitutional convention is in conflict with a revision or amendment proposed by the legislature and both are submitted to the electorate at the same election and both are approved, then the revision or amendment proposed by the convention shall prevail. If conflicting revisions or amendments are proposed by the same body and are submitted to the electorate at the same election and both are approved, then the revision or amendment receiving the highest number of votes shall prevail. [Add Const Con 1968 and election Nov 5, 1968; ren Const Con 1978 and election Nov 7, 1978]

 

Injury Lawyer Hawaii


William Lawson, Esq.
Century Square
1188 Bishop St. Suite 2902
Honolulu, HI 96813

New client hotline:
(808) 524-5300

Main business phone:
(808) 528-2525

Directions to Injury
Lawyer Hawaii

Injury Lawyer Hawaii- Get a free consultation

Hawaii Personal Injury
News & Articles (Archives)

Hawaii Court Cases re: Personal Injury Law

Hawaii Medical Experts-
reviews and links

Medical Advances-
new treatments &
other developments

Tort Reform or Tort Deform?




The Constitution Of The State Of Hawaii



Jones Act- maritime law and seaman cases



Products Liability - Hawaii Cases & Comment






Recommended sites:

Accident Lawyer
Honolulu Attorney


Accidents and Personal Injury Claims Hawaii

Injury Lawyer
Hawaii Attorney


Car Accident
Lawyer Hawaii


Hawaii Lawyer - Personal Injury

Hawaii Injury Lawyer Attorney

Hawaii Brain Injury Attorney

Hawaii Wrongful Death Attorney

Car Safety Recalls - Auto Recalls

Product Safety Recalls





Recent Personal Injury and Car Accident News

One recent case warms the heart of any litigator seeking fair treatment for his clients and justice from the courts. The Hawaii Supreme Court recently reaffirmed that attorneys' fees and costs can be recovered both in the trial court and on appeal in cases when a successful plaintiff establishes injuries from an unfair method of competition or an unfair business practice under HRS section 480-2. Gurrobat v. HTH Corporation, Sup. Ct. Appeal No. 12-0000764 (March 27, 2015). Such holdings prevent large businesses and insurers from 'winning' cases against employees and customers by burying their opponents with attorneys' fees and litigation costs.



The information provided in these pages is intended to be preliminary and informational ONLY. It is not legal advice by Injury Lawyer Hawaii nor may it be relied upon as such. The use of the Injury Attorney Hawaii webpages does not establish an attorney-client relationship. This page is Copyright Injury Attorney Hawaii 1999-2017 by Injury Attorney Hawaii All rights reserved. Its contents are the property of William H. Lawson-

Constitution of the State of Hawaii

We thank you for visiting our site!